Legal Opinion

Gronning v. Elliott Bay Mill & Lumber Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1911No. 8809PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gay, J., entered January 14, 1910, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The respondent, Mons Gronning, entered into a contract with the appellant, Elliott Bay Mill & Lumber Company, by the terms of which he agreed to sell it certain saw logs then owned by him located near Hoodsport, in this state. The contract was made in Seattle, at the office of one George Olson, then acting as the attorney for the respondent. At that time the officers of the appellant had not seen the logs, but agreed to take them at the then going price of the log dealer’s association, less a certain discount. It is conceded that the association at that time divided saw logs into three…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stackpole v. ArnoldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  2. Sherman v. SweenyWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Allen v. Tacoma Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Shotwell v. HamblinMississippi Supreme Court · 1851

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones, Rosquist, Killen Co. v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Langford v. PringleWashington Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API