Louise A. Wright v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BROWNING, Circuit Judge:
Appellant was charged with violating the Dyer Act. 18 U.S.C.A. § 2312. The car admittedly came into appellant’s possession with the consent of the owner. Appellant’s defense was that she intended to purchase the car, not to steal it, and, in any event, had done no more than exceed the scope of the permission given by the owner as to time and place of use of the vehicle, which was not in itself sufficient to establish an intent to steal.
Appellant’s counsel submitted written requests for instructions reflecting this theory of defense. Counsel asked to be advised prior to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Paul John Carbo, Frank Palermo, Joseph Sica, Louis Tom Dragna, and Truman K. Gibson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Downie v. PowersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Ross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
- James Hsaji Watada v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
3Cited by29 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MelvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- United States v. WanderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- United States v. EisenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Jeffrey Gaskins, AKA Jeffery GaskinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Frank T. McCown United States of America v. Gary Lee Barnes, United States of America v. Gary Leslie BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.