In Re Van Wechel's Estate
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
Garfield, J.—
The estate is insufficient to pay all debts, charges and legacies in full. The question for decision is whether all general legacies abate pro rata or whether the will clearly shows an intent to prefer the legacies payable to appel lants. To “abate”, as here used, means to reduce a legacy because of the insufficiency of the estate to pay all debts, charges and legacies in full. In re Estate of Hartman, 233 Iowa 405, 408, 9 N.W.2d 359, 362, and citations. See also 57 Am. Jur., Wills, section 1457.
Testator died in 1948. His will, made in 1946, provides first for the payment of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of Title Guarantee & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Jensen v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
- Wright v. CopelandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
- In Re Estate of HartmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- Leighton v. LeightonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McCulloch's Estate v. ConradSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- State v. ColeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
- Houts v. JamesonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- Zion Lutheran Church v. Executors of Estate of LampSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- In Re Maske's EstateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952