Legal Opinion

Wright v. Copeland

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 7, 1950No. 47565PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarfield, J.

The important question for decision is whether the residuary clause of the will is ambiguous.

Plaintiffs’ appeal is from the sustaining of defendants’ motion to dismiss the petition. Plaintiffs failed to plead further and thereby elected to stand on the record theretofore made. The above ruling is therefore deemed a final adjudication. Rule 86, Rules of Civil Procedure. See also Town of Lakota v. Gray, 240 Iowa 193, 194, 35 N.W. 2d 841, 842; Brown v. Schmitz, 237 Towa 418, 422, 22 N.W. 2d 340, 342, 343; In re Estate of Robinson, 231 Iowa 1099, 1101, 3 N.W. 2d 158, 160, and citations.

The…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Kalbach v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. In Re Estate of SyversonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  3. Jennings v. SchmitzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  4. Brown v. SchmitzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  5. Davis's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Newton v. City of Grundy CenterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
  2. Katz Investment Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  3. Riter v. Keokuk Electro-Metals CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  4. In Re Estate of PierceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  5. Rick v. BoegelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API