United States v. Ramelb
Army Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT ON RECONSIDERATION
ARQUILLA, Judge:
At a general court-martial, the appellant was ultimately tried on four specifications of larceny in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 921 (1988).1 He pleaded guilty by exceptions and substitutions to a lesser offense of wrongful appropriation as to each specification. A court of officer and enlisted members found him guilty of larceny as to all specifications and sentenced him to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for three years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to Private El.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- State v. FullerMontana Supreme Court · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. GilchristArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
- United States v. Major CARL W. AXELSON, JR.Army Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
- United States v. GrijalvaUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
- United States v. Specialist CHAD C. ADAMSArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
- United States v. Staff Sergeant NORRIS DAVISArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.