Legal Opinion

United States v. Ramelb

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided June 18, 1996No. ARMY 9401024PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT ON RECONSIDERATION

ARQUILLA, Judge:

At a general court-martial, the appellant was ultimately tried on four specifications of larceny in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 921 (1988).1 He pleaded guilty by exceptions and substitutions to a lesser offense of wrongful appropriation as to each specification. A court of officer and enlisted members found him guilty of larceny as to all specifications and sentenced him to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for three years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to Private El.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  5. State v. FullerMontana Supreme Court · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. GilchristArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  2. United States v. Major CARL W. AXELSON, JR.Army Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
  3. United States v. GrijalvaUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
  4. United States v. Specialist CHAD C. ADAMSArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
  5. United States v. Staff Sergeant NORRIS DAVISArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API