Legal Opinion

Paisley v. Hatter

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 16, 1911PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Simpson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Coubt by

Chief Justice Hobson

Beversing.

On July 15, 1905, D. H. Hatter conveyed to C. C. Paisley a tract of land for $1,500, the land being described in the deed by metes and bounds, the description concluding with these words: “Containing 100 acres, more or less, sold in gross and not by the acre.” On June 22, 1910, Paisley brought this suit against Hatter charging that there was a deficiency of 13 acres worth $20 an acre; that the tract only contained 87 acres of land, when by a mistake it was sold to him as a tract of 100 acres. He prayed judgment for $260 for the deficiency.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boggs v. BushCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. Anthony v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  3. Anderson v. DawsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Caudill v. BernheimCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  2. Page v. HoganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. Beckley v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  4. Green v. HammonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  5. Wallace v. CumminsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API