Legal Opinion

Wittman v. Littlefield

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1932PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCook, J.

This is an action by a judgment creditor of the defendant Henry W. Littlefield to set aside his assignment to his wife (also a defendant) of the disability benefits under two insurance policies on his life, as fraudulent and without consideration.

The defendant insurance company and the defendants Littlefield have interposed in their several answers, in addition to a general denial, three and four affirmative defenses, respectively. Plaintiff moves to strike out these defenses for insufficiency.

The first defense in the answer of the defendants Littlefield and the second defense in the answer…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chatham Phenix National Bank v. CrosneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. New York Plumbers Specialties Co. v. SteinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. HolzmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  2. Lion Credit Union v. GutmanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1932
  3. Herbach v. HerbachCity of New York Municipal Court · 1933
  4. Edgar A. Levy Leasing Co. v. WishnerNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  5. In Re KernDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API