Merwyn Austin Gipson v. Stanley D. Rosenberg and James D. Stewart
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
In this pro se appeal from the district court’s judgment dismissing a civil rights action against, among others, 1 two Texas attorneys, Merwyn A. Gipson persists in arguing that the attorneys deprived her of her property in violation of her constitutional rights. Finding this and related claims frivolous, we dismiss the appeal and impose sanctions under Fed.R.Civ.App. 38.
I
Aside from rehashing her pleadings, which consist of primarily conclusional allegations, Gipson does not on appeal expressly challenge the factual findings of the magistrate to whom this action was referred. The findings,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Dennis v. SparksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Glenn Crain v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Leo Henzel v. Richard Gerstein, Robert L. Shevin, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Church of Scientology of California v. Gabriel CazaresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mandawala v. NE Baptist HospCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- In Re KTMA Acquisition Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- Patel v. HeidelbergerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Goad v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1987
- Mandawala v. Baptist School of Health ProfessionsDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2020