Legal Opinion

Schaefer v. Hinkle

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1979No. 12106PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SOSA, Chief Justice.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in concluding that plaintiffs’ interests in MontgomeryEubank, Ltd., terminated when they left the Hinkle Corporation. We find no error.

Plaintiffs brought this action in the District Court of Bernalillo County seeking a judgment declaring that they are limited partners in Montgomery-Eubank Company, Ltd. Following a hearing, the court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint. Plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.

On July 31, 1975, plaintiffs, as limited partners, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schultz & Lindsay Construction Co. v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Sierra Blanca Sales Co., Inc. v. Newco Industries, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Woods v. CollinsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Shaeffer v. KeltonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Valdez v. Cillessen & Son, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Acquisto v. Joe R. Hahn Enterprises, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Boatwright v. HowardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Campbell v. KerrNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API