Legal Opinion

Stone v. Church

New York County Court, Broome County

Decided December 26, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacClary, J.

This is an action to recover a chattel pursuant to article 66 of the Civil Practice Act and sections 101 to 111 of the Binghamton City Court Act (Laws of 1931, chap. 482). The action was commenced by the service of a summons and verified complaint on the defendants on July 25, 1939. The chattels were replevined at the same time by the constable upon a requisition *1008signed by the city judge of Binghamton. The defendants served a notice for the return of the chattels and subsequently filed an answer in the form of a general denial.

The action was brought on for trial before a jury on October 19,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Roach v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Sinnott v. . FeiockNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Eads v. StephensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  4. Hawley v. BatesNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  5. Bingham v. MorrowMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Doughty v. SullivanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  2. Mongelli v. CabralYonkers City Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API