In RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, And Products Liability Litigation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE: HAIR RELAXER MARKETING MDL No. 3060 SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION Master Docket No. 23-cv-0818 Judge Mary M. Rowland MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendants Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, and Revlon Group Holdings LLC (collectively, “Defendant” or “Revlon”) move to compel the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”) to comply with a subpoena for documents issued in connection with this MDL. For the reasons stated herein, Revlon’s motion is denied. I.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Department of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. Alex J. RaineriCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. William F. FarleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.