Legal Opinion

United States v. William F. Farley

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 15, 1993No. 93-1759PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.

In January 1992 the United States filed a complaint alleging that William F. Farley violated Section 7A of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18a, commonly called the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act (“HSR Act”). The complaint alleges that on March 24, 1988, Farley failed to notify the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) when his purchases of the stock of West Point-Pepperell, Inc. (‘West Point”) exceeded $15 million, the point at which the reporting requirements of the HSR Act contained in 15 U.S.C. § 18a(a)(3)(B) are triggered. The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Redland Soccer Club, Inc. v. Department of the Army of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Enviro Tech International, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  3. Thomas v. CateDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
  4. In Re the Liquidation of Integrity InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  5. People Ex Rel. Birkett v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1998

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API