Legal Opinion

Carr v. Carr Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 1918No. Civ. No. 2585PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment quieting the plaintiff’s title to certain described real property. The evidence of plaintiff’s title consists of the judgment rendered in a certain action of divorce wherein Fannie A. King was plaintiff and Maurice A. King and the Carr Company were defendants. Upon issues voluntarily presented by the parties for decision in that action, the court determined therein that said real property was purchased or traded for by the defendant King with property then and there the property of the plaintiff, except as to the sum of five hundred dollars, which the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Allen v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Glass v. GlassCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lorraine v. LorraineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank v. HawkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Porter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Roy v. RoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Marshall v. MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API