Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cantelli

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 24, 2013No. 11-P-405PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCypher, J.

A jury convicted the defendant, Peter Cantelli, of possession of an infernal machine (explosive device), G. L. c. 266, § 102A,1 and two counts of improper storage of a firearm, G. L. c. 140, § 131L(a), (b), and acquitted the defendant of two counts of improper storage of a firearm.2 On appeal, the defendant argues that (1) the motion judge erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained when the police entered his apartment; (2) the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions; (3) the element of “control” in the improper storage statute, as applied in these circumstances,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TuschallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
  2. Commonwealth v. RaspberryMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  3. Commonwealth v. QadirMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API