Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Raspberry
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided July 27, 2018No. AC 16-P-1636PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtSacks, J.
*634 Before us is the defendant's interlocutory appeal 1 from the denial of her motions to suppress evidence obtained by police through (1) warrantless real-time tracking of the defendant's whereabouts using cell site location information (CSLI) and (2) a warrantless search of her motor vehicle, leading to the discovery of a loaded firearm and a stun gun. 2 We affirm.
*1198 Background . We recite the relevant facts as found by the motion judge, supplemented where necessary by uncontroverted police testimony, which the judge expressly credited in full. See Commonwealth v. Isaiah I ., 448 Mass. 334 ,…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Michigan v. DeFillippoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Lewis L. Wayne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. LugoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019