Legal Opinion

Seiker v. Pracht

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Marion District Court. Action for an accounting and a settlement of partnership business. Judgment for plaintiff Pracht on December 4,1885. The defendant Seiker brings the case to this court. The opinion states the material facts.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Simpson, C.:

This is an action for an accounting, and a settlement of partnership business, commenced by Praeht against Seiker in the Marion district court. The parties were partners from September 1, 1879, until on or about the 1st day of October, 1880, in a general merchandise store, and selling agricultural implements on commission. Seiker kept the books, attended to the correspondence, and Praeht was the active manager and salesman. It appears that most of the capital was furnished by the defendant in error. All the issues were referred to a referee, who heard the testimony, and…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clark v. O'TooleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Herring & Young v. WestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Bentley v. RamseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API