Legal Opinion
Alig-Mielcarek v. Jackson
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided August 16, 2012No. Civil Action No. 1:12-CV-2192-SCJ-JSAPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JUSTIN S. ANAND, United States Magistrate Judge.
The above-captioned action is before the Court on the “Motion to Quash Subpoena or, in the Alternative, for a Protective Order” [1] (“Motion to Quash”) filed by Defendant Clark Atlanta University, Inc. (“Clark Atlanta”). For the reasons discussed below, the Motion to Quash [1] is GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART. Clark Atlanta’s request to quash the subpoena [1-1] is GRANTED, but the request for a Protective Order [1-2] is DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND
A. The Allegations in the Complaint
This action arises out of a copyright infringement lawsuit…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Rios v. ReadDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1977
- Ragusa v. Malverne Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- In Re the Ancillary Proceeding of Equitable Plan Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
3Cited by11 opinions
- Richard Jordan v. Georgia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- Camp Bird Colorado, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of OurayColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- Binder v. Brentlinger EnterprisesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- Claar Cellars LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Washington · 2021
- D'Elia v. Indian River County School BoardDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.