Legal Opinion
People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. McNamara Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 10, 1972No. Civ. 13187PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EATON, J. *
Plaintiffs in action No. 191001 appeal the trial court’s order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment herein.
On January 25, 1963, a major contract for state highway construction was entered into between the State of California and McNamara-Mannix, a joint venture between two Canadian corporations, McNamara Corporation Ltd. and Mannix Co. Ltd. Both of these corporations were legally qualified to enter into such contract. The contract- contained in Standard Specification 8-1.02 the proviso that “The performance of the contract may not be assigned, except upon the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. MoormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Endler v. SchutzbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Acoustics, Inc. v. Trepte Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cory v. Golden State BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC v. Roche Diagnostics GmbHCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
- Mitsui & Co. v. Puerto Rico Water Resources AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1981
- Judicial Council v. Jacobs Facilities, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Wiechmann Engineers v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.