Legal Opinion

United States v. Godinez-Alcaraz

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 22, 2008No. 07-10429PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Angel Godinez-Alcaraz (“Godinez-Alcar-az”) appeals the sentence imposed follow*982ing his guilty plea to illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Godinez-Alcaraz argues the district court: (1) erred in applying a 16-level enhancement under U.S.S.G § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A); and (2) committed procedural error in imposing his sentence by improperly presuming the Guidelines sentence was reasonable and by failing to adequately explain its reasons for imposing the sentence. Godi-nez-Alcaraz did not raise these objections in the district court. We therefore review for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. Jasper BlackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. Sylvester Norman Knows His Gun, IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. Gilberto Pimentel-FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Morales-PerezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Ortez JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API