Legal Opinion

Moore v. Hill

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 15, 1877PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Injunction. Equity. lies adjudieata. Interpleader. Deeds. Evidence. Multifariousness. Before Judge Underwood. Eloyd County. At Cbambors. November oth, 1877. Report unnecessary.

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Judge.

1. Mrs. Hill sold land to Moore, giving bond for titles. The purchase money being only partially paid, litigation took place between them, which resulted- in a decree in her favor against him for the balance. Injunction is now prayed for to restrain the collection of that decree by a sale of the land under execution. But no equity is alleged in the bill which was not, or should not have been, set up and urged in the prior litigation. No good reason is apparent why the controversy should not be treated as finally terminated. 58 Ga., 388, 293.

*7622. In so far as the bill seeks to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  2. Desvergers v. WillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. White v. North Georgia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Gonia v. O'BrionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Wimberg v. SchwegemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Chisen v. SampeckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API