Chisen v. Sampeck
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Candler, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) It is argued in the brief of the plaintiffs in error that the defendants’ demurrers were meritorious and for this reason it was error for the trial judge to grant an interlocutory injunction. One ground of demurrer which the defendants urged at the interlocutory hearing was that the petition, though brought in two counts, was multifarious; and this being so, an interlocutory injunction should not be granted. This position was well taken. While it is permissible for a plaintiff to embrace several causes of action in one petition in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cooper v. Portner Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- White v. North Georgia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Gainesville & Dahlonega Electric Railway Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Peterson v. LottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Wolff v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gordy Tire Co. v. Dayton Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Rodgers v. StylesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Bigby v. BigbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Privette v. ChristianSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960