Legal Opinion

Carter v. Haynes

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 27, 2018No. 2170367PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge.

*863In this action regarding a motor-vehicle collision, Larry Carter appeals from a judgment of the Bessemer Division of the Jefferson Circuit Court ("the trial court") determining, among other things, that Daniel Keith Haynes was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law as to Carter's claim of wantonness and the issue of punitive damages. Specifically, Carter asserts that the trial court improperly excluded evidence from which the jury could have inferred that Haynes was liable for wanton conduct.

The record indicates the following. On March 6, 2015, Haynes was driving…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ex Parte EssarySupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  2. Whyte v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Preferred Risk Mut. Ins. Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Hawthorne v. Dravo Corp., Keystone Div.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Bowers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Batton v. Oak Invest Group CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API