Legal Opinion

Grimes v. Rush

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 11, 1946No. 39825PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The underlying issue is whether a quitclaim deed passes a contingent remainder interest of the fourth class; that is, a contingent remainder wherein the person to take is not ascertained as of the date of the grant. More precisely: Does the quitclaim deed of presumptive "heirs of the body" of the life tenant during the life tenant's lifetime divest such grantors of their chance to succeed to the title in the event they survive and classify as "heirs of the body" on the death of the life tenant? [311] Missouri cases in effect rule the issue in the affirmative. The instant action was to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Godman v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  2. Hendricks v. CallowaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  3. Summet v. City Realty & Brokerage Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  4. Schee v. BooneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  5. Weissenfels v. CableSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Teson v. VasquezMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Munday v. AustinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  3. Ragan v. LooneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  4. Thomas v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  5. McNeal v. BonnelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API