Legal Opinion

Handlan v. Handlan

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 26, 1952No. Nos. 42779, 42783 and 42784PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllison, C. J.

The first of these three consolidated cases is an appeal from the lower court’s allowance of receiver’s and attorneys’ fees. -The second is an original proceeding in prohibition and the third in mandamus, both to dislodge the receiver after the controversy between the actual parties had been settled, but before the allowances to the receiver and the attorneys had been paid.

The litigation below involved two affiliated corporations in St. Louis, the Handlan-Buck Company, a manufacturing concern, and Handlan, Inc.,' a sales organization. The underlying controversy was between two brothers, E. R.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Claim of Dependents of Seabaugh v. Garver Lumber Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  2. Handlan v. HandlanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  3. State Ex Rel. Kopke v. MulloySupreme Court of Missouri · 1931

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. MontgomeryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. In the Interest of J. L. L.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Paro v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. City of Mt. Vernon v. GaringerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  5. In Re JLLMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API