State v. Fuller
Montana Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceJustice Trieweiler
I concur with the majority opinion and all that is included in its discussion. I write separately to respond to the dissenting opiMon wMch seems to unnecessarily confuse what should be a straightforward application of clear constitutional principles.
The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution provides in relevant part that “ [n] o person shall be ... compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.”
Article II, Section 25, of the Montana Constitution provides that “[n]o person shall be compelled to testify against himself in a criminal proceeding.”
The United States…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. ImlayMontana Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. DonnellyMontana Supreme Court · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.