Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Fuller

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1996No. 95-343Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Trieweiler

I concur with the majority opinion and all that is included in its discussion. I write separately to respond to the dissenting opiMon wMch seems to unnecessarily confuse what should be a straightforward application of clear constitutional principles.

The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution provides in relevant part that “ [n] o person shall be ... compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.”

Article II, Section 25, of the Montana Constitution provides that “[n]o person shall be compelled to testify against himself in a criminal proceeding.”

The United States…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. State v. ImlayMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. DonnellyMontana Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API