Legal Opinion
Moberly v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 15, 2009No. 98-910PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WOLSKI, Judge.
Petitioner Teresa Moberly has moved for review of Special Master John F. Edwards’s decision which denied her compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10-300aa-34 (‘Vaccine Act” or “Act”), and which directed that judgment be entered for respondent, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services. The petition was filed by Mrs. Moberly on behalf of her daughter, Molly Moberly, and contended that a diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus (“DPT” or “DTP”) vaccination is the cause of Molly’s intractable seizure…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Althen v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Rose Capizzano v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Moberly v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Shapiro v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Moriarty v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Isaac v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Cedillo ex rel. Cedillo v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.