West v. Dorsey
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Weltner, Justice.
We granted certiorari to distinguish between Southern Discount Co. v. Ector, 246 Ga. 30 (268 SE2d 621) (1980), and Maynard v. Marshall, 91 Ga. 840 (18 SE 403) (1893), as to whether an amended penalty statute should apply retroactively to a usurious loan. This issue need not be addressed, however, as we hold that the 1976 amendment to the Secondary Security Deed Act did not alter the penalty for excessive interest charges. Ga. L. 1976, pp. 726, 727, amending Ga. L. 1966, pp. 574, 577; Code Ann. § 57-203 (a).
The borrowers executed a promissory note in 1973, secured by a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Union Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. DottenheimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Southern Discount Co. v. EctorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Maynard v. MarshallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- McGehee v. PetreeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Troutman v. BarnettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1850
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kenneth M. Henson v. Columbus Bank & Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Dorsey v. WestSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Ward v. HUDCO LOAN COMPANYSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- West v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Dorsey v. WestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.