Mateyko v. State

OPINION

MATHIAS, Judge.

The Hamilton Superior Court found that Joseph M. Mateyko ("'Mateyko") violated a condition of his probation and revoked Ma-teyko's probation. Mateyko appeals and presents two issues, which we restate as:

I. Whether the trial court erred in admitting hearsay testimony into evidence at the probation revocation hearing; and

II. Whether the evidence was sufficient to support the trial court's decision to revoke Mateyko's probation.

We reverse.

Facts and Procedural History

On October 13, 2005, the State charged Mateyko with three counts of Class B felony sexual misconduct with a…