Legal Opinion
Allegheny Bradford Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 29, 2004No. Slip Op. 04-44; Court 02-00073PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
RESTANI, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Allegheny Bradford Corporation, d/b/a Top Line Process Equipment Company (“Top Line”) asks the court to find Defendant United States (“Government”) in contempt for failing to obey a court-ordered injunction of the liquidation 1 of its stainless steel butt-weld tube fittings. Because the Government’s proposed reli-quidation of the entries is unsuitable for restoring the status quo ante, the court finds it necessary to take action in connection with the enforcement of the injunction.
BACKGROUND
The court’s injunction was entered in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Parisi v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Zenith Radio Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Consolidated Bearings Company, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Agro Dutch Industries Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Allegheny Bradford Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Nippon Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Solar Energy Indus. Ass'n. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2025
- Target Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.