Logan v. City of Two Rivers
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
Three questions are raised upon this appeal: (1) Another person having been appointed to the police force and having been paid his salary, is the city liable to- the plaintiff?. (2) Is the plaintiff entitled to recover interest on deferred payments? (3) Was the plaintiff guilty of laches?
I. It is contended that there are two lines of authority with respect to the effect of payment of salary to a de facto *501officer when set up as a defense to an action or proceeding by a de pire officer for the same salary. See 55 A. L. R. 997, note. It is claimed that Wisconsin in Clausen v. Fond du Lac County…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. . Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Kempster v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Schuster v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Warden v. Bayfield CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Clausen v. Fond du Lac CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Olson v. City of SuperiorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
- Schoonover v. City of ViroquaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944