Schuster v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of tbe circuit court for Milwaukee county: A. H. Reid, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
TimliN, J..With commendable and lawyerlike precision the argument of appellants’ counsel starts out with this proposition : “The one question involved is the character of relief to which respondents are entitled. That they are entitled to relief either in this action or at law is not denied.” The premises may be stated as follows: Each of the plaintiffs owns a separate piece of land abutting on the south side of Wells street in the city of Milwaukee, which under the laws of this state extends to the center of the street, and that part underlying the street is subject to the public easement…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Godden v. KimmellSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Galway v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- New York City v. PineSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Jackson v. StevensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Manitowoc v. Manitowoc & Northern Traction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Muscoda Bridge Co. v. Worden-Allen Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Gimbel Bros. v. Milwaukee Boston StoreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- Kimberly-Clark Co. v. Patten Paper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.