United States v. Harold M. Shock, Sr.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LAY, Circuit Judge.
This action involves a Libel of Information praying seizure and condemnation of two devices in the possession of appellee commonly known as ultrasonic machines shipped by the R. J. Lindquist Co., Los Angeles, California, to Harold Shock, Sr., a chiropractor, living in Mal-vern, Arkansas. The machines were condemned under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, Tit. 21 U.S.C. § 301 et seq., as being shipped in interstate commerce, “misbranded” under Tit. 21 U.S.C. § 352(f) (1) 1 as not bearing adequate directions for use, and as not otherwise exempt from the Act.
Harold M.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Baggett v. BullittSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- McNeese v. Board of Education for Community Unit School District 187 CahokiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- County of Allegheny v. Frank Mashuda Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Articles of DrugCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Article or Device "Hubbard Electrometer"District Court, District of Columbia · 1971
- Spriggs v. Altheimer, Arkansas School District No. 22Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Bascom v. PerryDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1973
- Spriggs v. Altheimer School District No. 22Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967