Legal Opinion

Szczepaniak v. City of Rochester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 21, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking *1621to annul the determination finding him guilty of disciplinary charges and terminating him from his employment as a firefighter for respondent. We conclude that the determination is supported by substantial evidence, i.e., “such relevant proof as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support a conclusion or ultimate fact” (300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180 [1978]; see CPLR 7803 [4]; see generally Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale &…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People ex rel. Vega v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Kelly v. SafirNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Gray v. AdduciNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Paul v. IsraelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API