Legal Opinion

City of Tampa v. W. L. Cobb Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 21, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Appellee, W. L. Cobb Construction Company, a corporation, plaintiff in the court below, was the holder of a paving certificate issued by the City of Tampa and which contained the following guaranty provision;

“The payment of this Certificate and annual interest thereon is hereby guaranteed by the City of Tampa; and in case of non-payment of principal and annual interest at maturity by the owner of property herein described, and the holder or owner of this certificate shall have failed to collect the same by suit, against the property or the owner thereof, the same shall be redeemed by the City…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Atlanta & St. Andrews Bay Railway Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  2. Sternbergh v. BrockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. Ex Parte RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  4. Ethel v. First Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
  5. Holston Salt & Plaster Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Scott v. City of TampaSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
  2. Mohasco Industries, Inc. v. The Maxwell Company, Inc., and Irving E. GreenfieldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. Chippas v. Midland Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Beach Community Bank v. Edward A. Labry, IIICourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012
  5. Frank R. MacNeill & Son, Inc. v. American Underwriters of Florida, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API