Legal Opinion

Gillette Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 31, 1997PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Appellate Tax Board (board) denying applications by The Gillette *671Company (Gillette) for abatement of taxes for tax years 1975 through 1983. Gillette sought to have the Commissioner of Revenue (commissioner) recompute its corporate excise tax using the so-called “unitary method” of net income determination and apportionment. Relying on Polaroid Corp. v. Commissioner of Revenue, 393 Mass. 490 (1984), the board ruled that there was no statutory authority for using the unitary method. On appeal, Gillette claims that the board erred in ruling (1) that the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxes of Vt.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Japan Line, Ltd. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. BairSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Exxon Corp. v. Department of Revenue of Wis.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  2. Carr v. HowardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  3. Boston Professional Hockey Ass'n v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  4. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co. v. Urstadt Biddle Properties, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  5. Commonwealth v. SimmonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API