Legal Opinion

California Real Estate Co. v. Walkup

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 21, 1915No. Civ. No. 1354PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. Charles Monroe, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The appeal is from the judgment and order denying the motion for a new trial in an action to recover six hundred and seventy dollars, alleged to be the balance due of the first payment under a written contract for the sale of certain real property located in Placer County. It is not disputed that the parties executed said contract, nor is it contended that anything therein contained is against public policy. It is not claimed that any element of unfairness or injustice appears upon its face and it is admitted that appellant paid to respondent the sum of fifty dollars only.

There seems to be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. RoperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Holt Manufacturing Co. v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Houghton v. Loma Prieta Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Prentice v. ErskineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Jenkins v. SharpfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wheeler Perry Co. v. Mortgage Bond Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Hollensteiner v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Ganiats Construction, Inc. v. HesseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Baker v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API