Legal Opinion

Huggins v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 6, 1969No. 18886PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bussey, Justice.

The plaintiff-respondent sued the defendant-appellant on two causes of action, one for malicious prosecution, and the other for abuse of process. Upon a former trial the jury found for the defendant on the cause of action for malicious prosecution, but for the plaintiff on the cause of action for abuse of process. Upon appeal, we reversed and remanded for a new trial of the cause of action for abuse of process. Huggins v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc., 249 S. C. 206, 153 S. E. (2d) 693 (1967).

The evidence as to the facts was fairly fully stated in the opinion on the former…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Huggins v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  2. Aaron v. Hampton Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  3. Pickett v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1906

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stoner v. Nash Finch, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Charleston Lumber Co. v. Miller Housing Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Continental Cablevision, Inc. v. Storer Broadcasting Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1986
  4. Swicegood v. LottCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Hainer v. American Medical International, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API