Youdall v. Kaufman
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County. D. M. Young, Judge. Modified and affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
PREWETT, J., pro tem.
Action in ejectment to recover the possession of two certain lots in the city of Stockton described as the north half of lot 10 and the north half of lot 12 in a certain block in that city.
The complaint is in the ordinary form, averring ownership in the respondent and ouster by the appellant and that the rents, issues, and profits are $150. The appellant answered, denying certain allegations and furnishing insufficient defenses as to others. The court sustained a demurrer to the answer, with leave to the appellant to amend. He declined to amend and in due course judgment…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sukeforth v. LordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Sechrist v. Rialto Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Hagely v. HagelyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Locke v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Pitzel v. Maier Brewing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cohen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Warren v. HarootunianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961