Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. McDaniel

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 1890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Oregon Circuit Court. — ITon. J. P. Hale, Judge.'

1Opinion of the Court · ThompsonThompson, J.

This prosecution was commenced before a justice of the peace on the following criminal information:

“Information for a misdemeanor.
“ State of Missouri,
“County of Oregon,
“ State of Missouri v. “David McDaniel.

ss.

Before A. J. Still, a Justice of the Peace within and for Oregon county, Missouri, Pinev township.

“Disturbing religious worship.
“T. J. Braswell, upon his oath of office as prosecnting attorney within and for the county of Oregon and state of Missouri, informs the justice that one *357David McDaniel, late of the county of Oregon and state of Missouri, on the sixth day of July, A. D. 1889, at…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Rombauer.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. FareMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. State v. BachMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BuckMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. State v. HeibelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. State v. KarnesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  5. State v. ThayerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API