Legal Opinion
Barre v. Pease Dev. Auth.
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided July 6, 1998No. CV-97-253-SDPublished
1Opinion of the Court
Barre v. Pease Dev. Auth. CV-97-253-SD 1/S/9S UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Robert Barre, et al v. Civil No. 97-253-SD Pease Development Authority, et al O R D E R The plaintiffs Robert Barre, James Freeman, Thomas Smith, and George Kathios, proceeding pro se, brought this action complaining about the termination of their employment against defendants Pease Development Authority and the New Hampshire Commission for Human Rights. Currently before the court is defendants' partial motion to dismiss, to which plaintiffs object. Background Plaintiffs all worked for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.