Legal Opinion

Martin v. Croft

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 18, 2008No. A08A1323PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Barnes, Chief Judge.

Katherine Martin, pro se, appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Imogene Croft, Ricky A. Mainor, and Shirley J. Mainor (collectively “the purchasers”) in the amount of $17,719. In substance, Martin alleges the trial court erred by finding that the purchasers were entitled to recover from her. We agree, and reverse.

Because both Martin and the purchasers are proceeding pro se, and have acted without legal representation throughout their dealings, this appeal is more complicated than what is essentially a contract dispute should be. For example, all the documents in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Village Enterprises, Inc. v. Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  2. Hall v. RossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. HOMELIFE COMMUNITIES GROUP, INC. v. Rosebud Park, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Georgia Magnetic Imaging, Inc. v. Greene County Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Rainier Holdings, Inc. v. TatumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Robert E. Ricciardelli Carpet Service, Inc. v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API