Moore v. Crowe
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Judge.
1. Testimony of a witness that an object in a photograph “looks like” the object about which he is testifying is sufficient to allow the admission of the pictorial representation in evidence. Elliott v. Ga. Power Co., 58 Ga. App. 151 (197 SE 914). As to identifying marks placed on a photograph to call attention to some particular feature of the pictorial representation material to the case and which have been identified by a witness, these are almost without exception held proper when they in fact aid one looking at the photograph to understand what the witness is talking about.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. MaloneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Hamdorf v. CorrieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
- Elliott v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Moon v. KimberlyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hieber v. WattCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- State v. EngelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Wilkins v. HesterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Lang v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Hieber v. WattCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969