Legal Opinion
SDS USA, INC. v. Ken Specialties, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 28, 2000No. CIV. 99-133PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLS, District Judge.
Plaintiff SDS USA, Inc. moves for summary judgment for patent infringement. Defendant Ken Specialties filed an Opposition, a cross-motion for summary judgment for non-infringement, and asserted the affirmative defenses of “obviousness” and “best mode.” The defendant also filed a “Supplemental and Reply Brief’ for a summary judgment that its new “split-pin” machine does not infringe SDS EasyBen-der machine. Plaintiffs motion is granted and the motions of the defendant are denied.
BACKGROUND
U.S. Patent No. 5,870,919 (“919 patent”) was issued to SDS as assignee on…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Amgen, Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- Nalco Co. v. Turner Designs, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Mars, Inc. v. Coin Acceptors, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2007