Legal Opinion
ATV Watch v. New Hampshire Department of Transportation
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 26, 2011No. 2009-788PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.
The petitioners, ATV Watch and Andrew Walters, appeal orders of the Superior Court (Mangones, J.) entered in this action for declaratory and injunctive relief against the New Hampshire Department of Transportation (DOT) seeking disclosure, under the Right-to-Know (RTK) Law, RSA ch. 91-A (2001 & Supp. 2010), and Part I, Article 8 of the State Constitution of records related to allowance of the use of all terrain vehicles (ATVs) on former railroad corridors converted to rail trails by DOT. We affirm.
The following facts are recited in the trial court’s orders or are supported in the record. On…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- GUILLERMO FELIPE DUEÑAS ITURRALDE v. COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCYCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- State v. LambertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- Wilson v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Church of Scientology International v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ciesla v. New Jersey Department of HealthNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
- Montenegro v. City of DoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Deere & Co. v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- State v. Max WilsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
- Union Leader Corp. v. New Hampshire Retirement SystemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.