Legal Opinion

Schroeder v. Department of Transportation of the Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1996PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGINLEY, Judge.

Kelly A. Schroeder (Appellant) appeals from an order of the Common Pleas Court of Washington County (trial court) which granted the motions for summary judgment of the Department of Transportation (DOT), Navis-tar International Transportation Corp. (Nav-istar) and Sheets Truck Center, Inc. (Sheets) (collectively Appellees). We affirm.

The relevant facts as found by the trial court are as follows:

Navistar designed and manufactured the cab and chassis of the -1987 International truck, Model S 1900, the subject of this civil action, and sold the ‘incomplete vehicle’ to Sheets in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Salerno v. LaBarrCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Roselli v. General Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. DeWeese v. Anchor Hocking Consumer and Industrial Products GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Long v. YinglingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Dansak v. Cameron Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Smitley v. Holiday Rambler Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Heginbotham v. Bowser & Tarr Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Armstrong County1997
  5. Moser v. Brodak's Supermarket Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API