Legal Opinion

Suffolk v. Chapman

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1964No. 38607PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Klingbiel

This case presents the question whether personal jurisdiction over expected adverse parties is necessary in a proceeding to perpetuate testimony. Margaret Suffolk and certain other descendants of Levi Z. Leiter, deceased, filed their original petition in the circuit court of Cook County on March 18, 1964, praying for an order to take her deposition concerning the circumstances surrounding the decedent at the time he made his will. Most of the named defendants are nonresidents and were not served with summons in this State. They appeared specially and moved to dismiss on the ground that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Elsa W. De Wagenknecht v. Mrs. Hugo StinnesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bekins v. HuishCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  2. People v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  3. People v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API