Legal Opinion

Ruzic v. Ruzic

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 13, 1979No. 48354Published

1Opinion of the Court

281 N.W.2d 502 (1979)

Irma Rita RUZIC, Petitioner, Appellant,

v.

Joseph J. RUZIC, Respondent.

No. 48354.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

July 13, 1979.

Shanedling, Phillips, Gross & Aaron and Bert M. Gross, Minneapolis, for petitioner, appellant.

Joseph J. Ruzic, pro se.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

SHERAN, Chief Justice.

Appeal from an order denying the parties' post-trial motions for amended findings in an action for dissolution of marriage.[1] Both the appellant-wife and the respondent-husband contend that the trial court abused its discretion in its distribution of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ruzic v. RuzicSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Ruprecht v. RuprechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Cashman v. CashmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API