Bates v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWhittemore, J.
In this action of tort the jury found for the plaintiff on two common law counts for personal injury and property damage. The defendant’s exceptions are to the denial of its motion for a directed verdict and its motion to enter a verdict under leave reserved.
There was no error in denying these motions. There was evidence of the defendant’s negligence and the plaintiff’s intestate could have been found not to have been contributorily negligent and to have complied with G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 90, § 15, as amended.
The plaintiff’s intestate was driving his automobile from west to east over the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McGlauflin v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Friese v. Boston Consolidated Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Carbone v. Trustees of New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Eisenhauer v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Papageorge v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Borden v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Fay v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959