Legal Opinion

Frank v. Wolfe

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLaughlin (Charles B.), J.

The plaintiffs move to modify the report of a referee by striking out the amount the latter awarded, viz., $500, and substituting the figure of $2,500. Originally, the action was brought to recover the sum of $2,500 for professional *416services rendered by the plaintiffs as attorneys for the defendant’s wife during a matrimonial controversy. • The plaintiffs made a motion for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and an order of reference was made which designated the referee to take proof and report as to the assessment of damages. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Livingston v. BlumenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  2. Cartier v. WilliamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. Dean v. DriggsNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lipton v. LiptonNew York Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Glove City Amusement Co. v. Smalley Chain Theatres, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API