Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (2007)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided March 9, 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear District Attorney Gibson:

This office has received your request for an official Attorney General Opinion in which you ask, in effect, the following questions:

1. What is the role of the County Excise Board in reviewing and approving or disapproving a budget submitted by the Board of County Commissioners in a county that has not adopted the Budget Board Act?

2. Is there a conflict between 19 O.S. 2001, § 1414[ 19-1414] (a part of the Budget Board Act) and 68 O.S. 2001, § 3007[68-3007](2) (a part of the County Budget Laws)?

Your questions involve the role of a county excise board to approve,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cox v. DawsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Summey v. TisdaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. Rapp v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. Excise Board of Sequoyah CountyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API